linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Remove select of phy-qcom-ufs from ufs-qcom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:07:57 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>, masneyb@...tation.org
Cc:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Remove select of phy-qcom-ufs from ufs-qcom

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:37 PM Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Evan,
>
> > CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM selects CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_UFS, assuming that
> > this was the only possible PHY driver Qualcomm's UFS controller
> > would use. But in SDM845, the UFS driver is bundled into phy-qcom-qmp,
> > and phy-qcom-ufs is unused.
> >
> > Remove the select, since for SDM845 it adds useless drivers to the
> > build.
>
> Applied to 5.1/scsi-queue.

Should this be accompanied by a change to arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
that sets 'CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_UFS=m'?  I don't personally have any
non-SDM845 devices to test on, but I'm sorta assuming they will all
break without the defconfig update?

Added a few more people (and linux-arm-msm list) to this thread in
case this matters to anyone.

-Doug