[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59962ef4-d349-e5ac-3dab-e1c70409f8ff@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:40:36 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvram: annotate implicit fall through
On 1/14/19 2:44 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
> this place in the code produced a warning (W=1).
>
> This commit remove the following warning:
>
> drivers/char/generic_nvram.c:83:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
> ---
> drivers/char/generic_nvram.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c b/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c
> index ff5394f47587..53123c110f7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static int nvram_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PMAC
> case OBSOLETE_PMAC_NVRAM_GET_OFFSET:
> printk(KERN_WARNING "nvram: Using obsolete PMAC_NVRAM_GET_OFFSET ioctl\n");
Here you could use the pr_warn() macro instead of the obsolete printk KERN_WARNING, but that'd
be another patch.
Anyway:
Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Thanks
--
Gustavo
> + /* fall through */
> case IOC_NVRAM_GET_OFFSET: {
> int part, offset;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists