[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190116213425.GA16366@krava>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:25 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: perf segfault in in ordered_events__free()
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:49AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are debugging a segfault of perf in ordered_events__free().
hi,
any backtrace or info on how to reproduce it?
> Disassemble shows the segfault was caused by oe->buff == NULL
> in the following line:
>
> /*
> * Current buffer might not have all the events allocated
> * yet, we need to free only allocated ones ...
> */
> list_del(&oe->buffer->list);
>
> After poking around the code, I suspect it is caused by the following
> condition in alloc_event():
>
> } else if (oe->buffer) {
> new = &oe->buffer->event[oe->buffer_idx];
> if (++oe->buffer_idx == MAX_SAMPLE_BUFFER)
> oe->buffer = NULL;
argh.. yea, we need to check oe->buffer in ordered_events__free
would attached change fix it for you?
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c b/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c
index 897589507d97..ea523d3b248f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/ordered-events.c
@@ -391,8 +391,10 @@ void ordered_events__free(struct ordered_events *oe)
* Current buffer might not have all the events allocated
* yet, we need to free only allocated ones ...
*/
- list_del(&oe->buffer->list);
- ordered_events_buffer__free(oe->buffer, oe->buffer_idx, oe);
+ if (oe->buffer) {
+ list_del(&oe->buffer->list);
+ ordered_events_buffer__free(oe->buffer, oe->buffer_idx, oe);
+ }
/* ... and continue with the rest */
list_for_each_entry_safe(buffer, tmp, &oe->to_free, list) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists