linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: dsa: Split platform data to header file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f593b8b-5bb7-f884-d1d6-d509fd794419@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:06:48 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Marvell Dove/MV78xx0/Orion SOC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: dsa: Split platform data to header file

On 1/16/19 2:29 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>> index b3eefe8e18fd..6178b648d08a 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/ethtool.h>
>>  #include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
>>  #include <linux/phy.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_data/dsa.h>
>>  #include <net/devlink.h>
>>  #include <net/switchdev.h>
> 
> Hi Florian
> 
> Could there be one more patch at the end which removes this?  I think
> it is here just as an intermediary step?

Yes, we can have only dsa2.c and legacy.c include that file from there
on, I will resubmit with that change, thanks!
-- 
Florian