lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:50:44 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Marvell Dove/MV78xx0/Orion SOC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: dsa: Split platform data to header file

On 1/16/19 3:06 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/16/19 2:29 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>>> index b3eefe8e18fd..6178b648d08a 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>  #include <linux/ethtool.h>
>>>  #include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
>>>  #include <linux/phy.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_data/dsa.h>
>>>  #include <net/devlink.h>
>>>  #include <net/switchdev.h>
>>
>> Hi Florian
>>
>> Could there be one more patch at the end which removes this?  I think
>> it is here just as an intermediary step?
> 
> Yes, we can have only dsa2.c and legacy.c include that file from there
> on, I will resubmit with that change, thanks!

We actually need to keep that include in there, because we use
DSA_MAX_SWITCHES in net/dsa.h and splitting that define away could be a
bit tedious since it is used by dsa_platform_data which was exposed before.

Another option could be to not expose dsa_platform_data all, only
dsa_chip_data which describes a single switch, and then we can have a
nice and lean platform_data/dsa.h file that only has a few definitions.

Which route do you prefer?
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists