[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190115.213612.497427192026892080.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:36:12 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "rxrpc: Allow failed client calls to be
retried"
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:59:13 +0000
> The changes introduced to allow rxrpc calls to be retried creates an issue
> when it comes to refcounting afs_call structs. The problem is that when
> rxrpc_send_data() queues the last packet for an asynchronous call, the
> following sequence can occur:
...
> Synchronising the clean up after rxrpc_kernel_send_data() returns an error
> with the asynchronous cleanup is then tricky to get right.
>
> Mostly revert commit c038a58ccfd6704d4d7d60ed3d6a0fca13cf13a4. The two API
> functions the original commit added aren't currently used. This makes
> rxrpc_kernel_send_data() always return successfully if it queued the data
> it was given.
>
> Note that this doesn't affect synchronous calls since their Rx notification
> function merely pokes a wait queue and does not refcounting. The
> asynchronous call notification function *has* to do refcounting and pass a
> ref over the work item to avoid the need to sync the workqueue in call
> cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists