[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1547606634.4433.179.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:43:54 +0800
From: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
To: Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
<chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] usb: musb: Extract set toggle as a separate
interface
Hi Bin,
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 14:40 -0600, Bin Liu wrote:
> Hi Min,
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:19:42PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 15/01/2019 02:43, min.guo@...iatek.com wrote:
> > > From: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
> > >
> > > Add a common interface for set data toggle
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > > index b59ce9a..16d0ba4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > > @@ -306,6 +306,25 @@ static inline void musb_save_toggle(struct musb_qh *qh, int is_in,
> > > usb_settoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, !is_in, csr ? 1 : 0);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline u16 musb_set_toggle(struct musb_qh *qh, int is_in,
> > > + struct urb *urb)
> > > +{
> > > + u16 csr = 0;
> > > + u16 toggle = 0;
> > > +
> > > + toggle = usb_gettoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, !is_in);
> > > +
> > > + if (is_in)
> > > + csr = toggle ? (MUSB_RXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > > + | MUSB_RXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE) : 0;
> > > + else
> > > + csr = toggle ? (MUSB_TXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > > + | MUSB_TXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE)
> > > + : MUSB_TXCSR_CLRDATATOG;
> >
> > Can we switch the if and use is_out logic as function parameter. This would make
> > the code easier to understand.
>
> based on the current implementation in patch 4/4, I don't think we need
> this separate patch any more, but Matthias' comments still apply.
Okay.
> Regards,
> -Bin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists