linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] usb: musb: Extract set toggle as a separate interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1547606647.4433.180.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:44:07 +0800
From:   Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] usb: musb: Extract set toggle as a separate
 interface

Hi Matthias,

On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 16:19 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 15/01/2019 02:43, min.guo@...iatek.com wrote:
> > From: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > Add a common interface for set data toggle
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > index b59ce9a..16d0ba4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c
> > @@ -306,6 +306,25 @@ static inline void musb_save_toggle(struct musb_qh *qh, int is_in,
> >  	usb_settoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, !is_in, csr ? 1 : 0);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline u16 musb_set_toggle(struct musb_qh *qh, int is_in,
> > +	struct urb *urb)
> > +{
> > +	u16 csr = 0;
> > +	u16 toggle = 0;
> > +
> > +	toggle = usb_gettoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, !is_in);
> > +
> > +	if (is_in)
> > +		csr = toggle ? (MUSB_RXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > +				| MUSB_RXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE) : 0;
> > +	else
> > +		csr = toggle ? (MUSB_TXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > +				| MUSB_TXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE)
> > +				: MUSB_TXCSR_CLRDATATOG;
> 
> Can we switch the if and use is_out logic as function parameter. This would make
> the code easier to understand.

Okay.

> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> > +
> > +	return csr;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Advance this hardware endpoint's queue, completing the specified URB and
> >   * advancing to either the next URB queued to that qh, or else invalidating
> > @@ -772,13 +791,8 @@ static void musb_ep_program(struct musb *musb, u8 epnum,
> >  					);
> >  			csr |= MUSB_TXCSR_MODE;
> >  
> > -			if (!hw_ep->tx_double_buffered) {
> > -				if (usb_gettoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, 1))
> > -					csr |= MUSB_TXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > -						| MUSB_TXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE;
> > -				else
> > -					csr |= MUSB_TXCSR_CLRDATATOG;
> > -			}
> > +			if (!hw_ep->tx_double_buffered)
> > +				csr |= musb_set_toggle(qh, !is_out, urb);
> >  
> >  			musb_writew(epio, MUSB_TXCSR, csr);
> >  			/* REVISIT may need to clear FLUSHFIFO ... */
> > @@ -860,17 +874,12 @@ static void musb_ep_program(struct musb *musb, u8 epnum,
> >  
> >  	/* IN/receive */
> >  	} else {
> > -		u16	csr;
> > +		u16 csr = 0;
> >  
> >  		if (hw_ep->rx_reinit) {
> >  			musb_rx_reinit(musb, qh, epnum);
> > +			csr |= musb_set_toggle(qh, !is_out, urb);
> >  
> > -			/* init new state: toggle and NYET, maybe DMA later */
> > -			if (usb_gettoggle(urb->dev, qh->epnum, 0))
> > -				csr = MUSB_RXCSR_H_WR_DATATOGGLE
> > -					| MUSB_RXCSR_H_DATATOGGLE;
> > -			else
> > -				csr = 0;
> >  			if (qh->type == USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_INT)
> >  				csr |= MUSB_RXCSR_DISNYET;
> >  
> >