lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:47:18 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation

* Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> [190116 13:28]:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:28:36PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > The SDHCI core is know properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO,
> 
> "know" -> "now"
> 
> > so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement
> > ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > Note: this patch has only been compiled tested, as I don't have the
> > hardware to test it.
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> I can't runtime test this myself, but it certainly looks like this would
> do the right thing because it calls the core now call the very same
> function as this used to, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> 
> Adding Tony and linux-omap for a slightly wider audience and hopefully
> find someone to test this on. For reference, the whole series is here:
> 
> 	https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/?series=66905

Thanks Kishon can you please review and test?

Regards,

Tony

> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
> > index d264391616f9..c2a28930086f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c
> > @@ -987,7 +987,6 @@ static int sdhci_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		goto err_put_sync;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	host->mmc_host_ops.get_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro;
> >  	host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch =
> >  					sdhci_omap_start_signal_voltage_switch;
> >  	host->mmc_host_ops.set_ios = sdhci_omap_set_ios;
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> > 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ