lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db34cf8a-d929-ffe1-91a5-ed3da0c6df86@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:47:50 +0000
From:   Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels

Hi Arnaldo,

>> Unfortunately the annobin notes will probably not be very helpful as they
>> only record a minor subset of the typical gcc command line options.
>> (Specifically: -O, -g, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE, -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS, 
>> -fcf-protection, -fpic (and variants), -fshort-enum, -fstack-clash-protection,
>> -fstack-protector, -mstackrealign, -fexceptions).
> 
> Humm, is -fno-omit-frame-pointer there by any chance? :-)

Not at the moment, although it could be added.  All of the options 
mentioned in the above list are recorded because they have an impact
on the security hardening of the binary.  Other options are ignored
because, at least for now, they have no security implications.

Cheers
  Nick

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ