linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190116160422.GH2243@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:04:22 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels

Em Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:47:50PM +0000, Nick Clifton escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> >> Unfortunately the annobin notes will probably not be very helpful as they
> >> only record a minor subset of the typical gcc command line options.
> >> (Specifically: -O, -g, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE, -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS, 
> >> -fcf-protection, -fpic (and variants), -fshort-enum, -fstack-clash-protection,
> >> -fstack-protector, -mstackrealign, -fexceptions).
> > 
> > Humm, is -fno-omit-frame-pointer there by any chance? :-)
> 
> Not at the moment, although it could be added.  All of the options 
> mentioned in the above list are recorded because they have an impact
> on the security hardening of the binary.  Other options are ignored
> because, at least for now, they have no security implications.

Would be interestint to have that info, as we could hint the user that
backtraces should be done with something else than '--call-graph fp' :-)

- Arnaldo