[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d33966dd-6146-f73a-ee01-693767a7f538@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:25:24 +0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels
Hi Arnaldo,
>>> Humm, is -fno-omit-frame-pointer there by any chance? :-)
> Would be interestint to have that info, as we could hint the user that
> backtraces should be done with something else than '--call-graph fp' :-)
OK, well I have added the feature to annobin 8.67, now in Fedora
rawhide. Unfortunately it will take a while before the information
actually gets into binaries, since the new data is only recorded
when a package is rebuilt. So basically you are looking at Fedora 30
at the earliest.
If you want to see the plugin in action, build something on a rawhide
system (or a mock chroot) using the gcc command line option -fplugin=annobin.
(Make sure that you have annobin-8.67 installed). Then once the binary
is built run "readelf --wide --notes <file> | grep omit" to see the
omit-frame-pointer notes.
Cheers
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists