linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Yama: Check for pid death before checking ancestry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:02:51 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+a9ac39bf55329e206219@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yama: Check for pid death before checking ancestry

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, James Morris wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > It's possible that a pid has died before we take the rcu lock, in which
> > case we can't walk the ancestry list as it may be detached. Instead, check
> > for death first before doing the walk.
> > 
> > Reported-by: syzbot+a9ac39bf55329e206219@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Fixes: 2d514487faf1 ("security: Yama LSM")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > James, can you please send this to Linus in your -fixes tree?
> 
> Done.

I mean, queued in that tree.

> 
> > ---
> >  security/yama/yama_lsm.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> > index ffda91a4a1aa..02514fe558b4 100644
> > --- a/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> > +++ b/security/yama/yama_lsm.c
> > @@ -368,7 +368,9 @@ static int yama_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
> >  			break;
> >  		case YAMA_SCOPE_RELATIONAL:
> >  			rcu_read_lock();
> > -			if (!task_is_descendant(current, child) &&
> > +			if (!pid_alive(child))
> > +				rc = -EPERM;
> > +			if (!rc && !task_is_descendant(current, child) &&
> >  			    !ptracer_exception_found(current, child) &&
> >  			    !ns_capable(__task_cred(child)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
> >  				rc = -EPERM;
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>