[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117081314.GD10486@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:13:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, lizefan@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
dennis@...nel.org, Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] psi: introduce psi monitor
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:17:28PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Also, you probably want to use atomic_t for g->polling, because we
> > > (sadly) have architectures where regular stores and atomic ops don't
> > > work 'right'.
> >
> > Oh, I see. Will do. Thanks!
>
> Yikes, that's news to me too. Good to know.
See Documentation/atomic_t.txt, specifically the atomic_set() part in
SEMANTICS.
Archs that suffer this include (but are not limited to): parisc,
sparc32-smp, something arc.
And yes, I would dearly love to kill all SMP support for architectures
like that..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists