linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] thermal: cpu_cooling: Clarify error message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:34:28 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "open list:THERMAL/CPU_COOLING" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] thermal: cpu_cooling: Clarify error message

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:57 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 14-01-19, 15:51, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > Make it clear that it is a failure if the cpufreq driver was unable to
> > register as a cooling device. Makes it easier to find in logs and
> > grepping for words like fail, err, warn.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> > index dfd23245f778..6fff16113628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> > @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >
> >               cdev = __cpufreq_cooling_register(np, policy, capacitance);
> >               if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
> > -                     pr_err("cpu_cooling: cpu%d is not running as cooling device: %ld\n",
> > +                     pr_err("cpu_cooling: cpu%d failed to register as cooling device: %ld\n",
> >                              policy->cpu, PTR_ERR(cdev));
> >                       cdev = NULL;
> >               }
>
> Always keep such cleanup patches at the top, so the maintainers can
> pick them up easily even if the entire series doesn't get in.

Actually, if nothing in the series depends on this change and this
change doesn't depend on anything in the series, why is it part of the
series at all?