lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHLCerNqZny+KSs-S-+KbpdGjxtB4wafygAY4M7oNc8kvEqT2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:09:58 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] drivers: thermal: of-thermal: Print name of device
 node with error

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:24 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-01-14 02:21:04)
> > Make it easier to debug devicetree definition in case of errors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > index 4bfdb4a1e47d..08c3ccbdacf8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > @@ -867,14 +867,14 @@ __init *thermal_of_build_thermal_zone(struct device_node *np)
> >
> >         ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay-passive", &prop);
> >         if (ret < 0) {
> > -               pr_err("missing polling-delay-passive property\n");
> > +               pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay-passive property\n", np->name);
>
> Not sure you've triggered this code path because it's an error, but I'd
> expect it to just be np, not np->name here. It's too bad the compiler
> can't catch this.

Not sure what happened here in the refactor before sending but good
catch. Fixed now.

Thanks,
Amit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ