[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117172109.GU261387@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:21:09 -0800
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
hemantg@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Deassert RTS while baudrate
change command
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:09:44PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 03:46:28PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> > Using RTS seems|ed like a nice solutions, since it's the native way to
> > prevent the controller from sending data, instead of doing some custom
> > hack. However Johan seems to be fairly convinced that flow control and
> > manual toggling of RTS can be problematic, and we have seen that
> > disabling flow control has its own problems. Maybe it's time to
> > consider other solutions like the DISCARD_RX flag we discussed
> > earlier. Not that I really liked this custom solution, but in the end
> > it might be a more robust way to address the issue.
> >
> > Johan/Marcel/others: Do you have any further ideas or input on this?
>
> I don't see why deasserting RTS wouldn't work, well at least as long as
> the RTS signal is wired correctly.
>
> My point was simply that calling serdev_device_set_rts() will generally
> not work unless you first disable automatic (i.e. hw-managed) flow
> control using serdev_device_set_flow_control(). The exact behaviour is
> serial-controller dependent, but I assume the driver needs to be
> platform agnostic.
I observed that the qcom_geni_serial driver doesn't raise RTS with
flow control disabled. It seems we have to investigate why that's the
case. I agree that the driver should be platform agnostic.
Cheers
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists