[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190117172152.GA32292@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:21:52 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with
dma_map_resource
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 01:42:26PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 2019-01-11 19:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > vb2_dc_get_userptr pokes into arm direct mapping details to get the
> > resemblance of a dma address for a a physical address that does is
> > not backed by a page struct. Not only is this not portable to other
> > architectures with dma direct mapping offsets, but also not to uses
> > of IOMMUs of any kind. Switch to the proper dma_map_resource /
> > dma_unmap_resource interface instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> There are checks for IOMMU presence in other places in vb2-dma-contig,
> so it was used only when no IOMMU is available, but I agree that the
> hacky code should be replaced by a generic code if possible.
>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>
> V4L2 pipeline works fine on older Exynos-based boards with CMA and IOMMU
> disabled.
Do you know if these rely on the offsets? E.g. would they still work
with the patch below applied on top. That would keep the map_resource
semantics as-is as solve the issue pointed out by Robin for now.
If not I can only think of a flag to bypass the offseting for now, but
that would be pretty ugly. Or go for the long-term solution of
discovering the relationship between the two devices, as done by the
PCIe P2P code..
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 8e0359b04957..25bd19974223 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_direct_map_sg);
dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_resource(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr,
size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
- dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, paddr);
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr = paddr;
if (unlikely(!dma_direct_possible(dev, dma_addr, size))) {
report_addr(dev, dma_addr, size);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists