linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10619062-9531-e843-1620-7518e27583f8@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:34:01 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16

On 1/17/19 11:32 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:35:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Guenter,
>>>
>>> Could you share me the .config?
>>
> Any 32 bit configuration from affected architectures should work.
> 
>> From your dmesg log, looks the test is run on i386, so please
>> feel free to try the following patch:
>>
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154772088110800&w=2
>>
> Is this still relevant ? Today's image is fine.

The patches were pulled, I think Ming would still appreciate it if
you could test the previous tree with that patch on top.

-- 
Jens Axboe