linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190117213524.GA26237@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:35:24 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:34:01AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/17/19 11:32 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:35:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Guenter,
> >>>
> >>> Could you share me the .config?
> >>
> > Any 32 bit configuration from affected architectures should work.
> > 
> >> From your dmesg log, looks the test is run on i386, so please
> >> feel free to try the following patch:
> >>
> >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154772088110800&w=2
> >>
> > Is this still relevant ? Today's image is fine.
> 
> The patches were pulled, I think Ming would still appreciate it if
> you could test the previous tree with that patch on top.
> 

next-20190116 with Ming's patch added and "sh: generate uapi header and
syscall table header files" reverted:

Qemu test results:
	total: 343 pass: 343 fail: 0

Note though that my tests do not run any block device stress tests.

Guenter