[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40459ee8-7933-505a-bc39-64858d4e7637@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:17:18 +0100
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Add power domain driver for corners on
msm8996/sdm845
On 18/01/2019 04:54, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On 1/17/2019 8:33 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2019 05:02, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>>> Rajendra Nayak (9):
>>> dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings
>>> OPP: Add support for parsing the 'opp-level' property
>>> dt-bindings: power: Add qcom rpm power domain driver bindings
>>> soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a Power domain driver to model corners
>>> soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state
>>> arm64: dts: msm8996: Add rpmpd device node
>>> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver
>>> arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node
>>> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Mark mx as a parent for cx
>>>
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt | 3 +
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt | 145 +++++++
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 34 ++
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 51 +++
>>
>> Whenever I see these patches adding support for msm8996 (aka sdm820) and sdm845
>> simultaneously, I think to myself: "Why is sdm835 being left out? It was released
>> between sdm820 and sdm845, it cannot be /that/ different."
>
> It isn't that different, and it should be quite straight forward to add support for it
> with the rpmpd driver (the rpmhpd is for platforms sdm845 and beyond which use rpmh)
>
> When I started working on these patches, support for sdm835 upstream was non-existent
> so I started off with what was the better supported one which was the 820 (msm8996).
Once you land this patch series, could you take a quick look at how much work is needed
to add msm8998 support? I'm betting it would take you only a few hours.
Regards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists