[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <392710d8-3e3d-4987-e0be-a5098da852ab@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:50:47 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] Add power domain driver for corners on
msm8996/sdm845
On 1/18/2019 3:47 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 18/01/2019 04:54, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> On 1/17/2019 8:33 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/01/2019 05:02, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rajendra Nayak (9):
>>>> dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings
>>>> OPP: Add support for parsing the 'opp-level' property
>>>> dt-bindings: power: Add qcom rpm power domain driver bindings
>>>> soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a Power domain driver to model corners
>>>> soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state
>>>> arm64: dts: msm8996: Add rpmpd device node
>>>> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver
>>>> arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node
>>>> soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Mark mx as a parent for cx
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt | 3 +
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt | 145 +++++++
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 34 ++
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 51 +++
>>>
>>> Whenever I see these patches adding support for msm8996 (aka sdm820) and sdm845
>>> simultaneously, I think to myself: "Why is sdm835 being left out? It was released
>>> between sdm820 and sdm845, it cannot be /that/ different."
>>
>> It isn't that different, and it should be quite straight forward to add support for it
>> with the rpmpd driver (the rpmhpd is for platforms sdm845 and beyond which use rpmh)
>>
>> When I started working on these patches, support for sdm835 upstream was non-existent
>> so I started off with what was the better supported one which was the 820 (msm8996).
>
> Once you land this patch series, could you take a quick look at how much work is needed
> to add msm8998 support? I'm betting it would take you only a few hours.
Sure, I can take a look. I think I do have a 8998 device which I can probably do
some testing on too.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists