[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190118155108.jfu4yjsod225kst3@e5254000004ec.dyn.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:51:08 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: phy: marvell10g: Add support for
2.5GBASET and 5GBASET
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:23:49PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> @@ -264,8 +265,10 @@ static int mv3310_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - linkmode_and(phydev->advertising, phydev->advertising,
> - phydev->supported);
> + /* Make sure we advertise all the supported modes, and not just the
> + * default one specified in the driver's .features.
> + */
> + linkmode_copy(phydev->advertising, phydev->supported);
This looks wrong to me, it tramples over the work that phy_probe()
did, specifically with regard to the pause mode bits. Please see
the comments in that function about the pause mode bits.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists