[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121170511.GA8088@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:05:12 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched: convert sighand_struct.count to refcount_t
On 01/18, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> --- a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> else
> bytes += kobjsize(current->files);
>
> - if (current->sighand && atomic_read(¤t->sighand->count) > 1)
> + if (current->sighand && refcount_read(¤t->sighand->count) > 1)
> sbytes += kobjsize(current->sighand);
> else
> bytes += kobjsize(current->sighand);
I fail to understand this code with or without the patch... I do not see
how is it possible to hit ->sighand == NULL or sighand->count == 0 in
proc_pid_status() paths.
Nevermind, this is off-topic.
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists