lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121170511.GA8088@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:05:12 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched: convert sighand_struct.count to refcount_t

On 01/18, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> --- a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	else
>  		bytes += kobjsize(current->files);
>  
> -	if (current->sighand && atomic_read(&current->sighand->count) > 1)
> +	if (current->sighand && refcount_read(&current->sighand->count) > 1)
>  		sbytes += kobjsize(current->sighand);
>  	else
>  		bytes += kobjsize(current->sighand);

I fail to understand this code with or without the patch... I do not see
how is it possible to hit ->sighand == NULL or sighand->count == 0 in
proc_pid_status() paths.

Nevermind, this is off-topic.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ