[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121172822.GB8088@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:28:23 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
keescook@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: convert signal_struct.sigcnt to refcount_t
On 01/18, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> For the signal_struct.sigcnt it might make a difference
> in following places:
> - put_signal_struct(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only
> provides RELEASE ordering and control dependency on success
> vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart
this is fine.
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists