[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4B8B877@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:11:42 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] sched: convert signal_struct.sigcnt to refcount_t
> On 01/18, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> >
> > For the signal_struct.sigcnt it might make a difference
> > in following places:
> > - put_signal_struct(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only
> > provides RELEASE ordering and control dependency on success
> > vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart
>
> this is fine.
>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Thank you Oleg!
Will you be able to take this and the other scheduler
patch to whatever tree/path it should normally go to get eventually
integrated?
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists