[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8746aab308f76b4d8f33a20fea3f54da323832b3.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:40:54 +0000
From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Riedmüller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Christian Hemp <c.hemp@...tec.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: imx6: Add support for Phytec phyBOARD
i.MX6UL Segin
Hi Fabio,
On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 19:18 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin-
> > full.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin-full.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..83cdf4fa10c0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin-full.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016 PHYTEC Messtechnik GmbH
> > + * Author: Christian Hemp <c.hemp@...tec.de>
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +#include "imx6ul-phytec-pcl063.dtsi"
> > +#include "imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin.dtsi"
> > +#include "imx6ul-phytec-peb-eval-01.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Phytec phyBOARD-Segin i.MX6 UltraLite Full
> > Featured";
> > + compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10", "phytec,imx6ul-
> > pcl063",
> > + "fsl,imx6ul";
>
> Better keep it in a single line?
>
It makes it longer than 80 chars, but I'm not adverse to that.
> > +&ecspi3 {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi3>;
> > + cs-gpios = <&gpio1 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + spidev@0 {
> > + compatible = "spidev";
>
> Doesn't the kernel complain about spidev dts nodes?
>
Oh, yes, it does when spidev is loaded...
Removing.
Martyn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists