linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 108/111] loop: Get rid of nested acquisition of loop_ctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121122507.021764057@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:43:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 108/111] loop: Get rid of nested acquisition of loop_ctl_mutex

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit c28445fa06a3a54e06938559b9514c5a7f01c90f upstream.

The nested acquisition of loop_ctl_mutex (->lo_ctl_mutex back then) has
been introduced by commit f028f3b2f987e "loop: fix circular locking in
loop_clr_fd()" to fix lockdep complains about bd_mutex being acquired
after lo_ctl_mutex during partition rereading. Now that these are
properly fixed, let's stop fooling lockdep.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_de
 	int		error;
 	bool		partscan;
 
-	error = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	error = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 	error = -ENXIO;
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_devic
 	if (!file)
 		goto out;
 
-	error = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	error = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (error)
 		goto out_putf;
 
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_devic
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) {
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo,
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 	bool partscan = false;
 
-	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size &&
@@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ loop_get_status(struct loop_device *lo,
 	struct kstat stat;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) {
@@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ static int lo_simple_ioctl(struct loop_d
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	switch (cmd) {