linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] tpm: pass an array of tpm_extend_digest structures to tpm_pcr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e97d1377-b8d8-6ecb-4c7f-1b08235c6864@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:50:49 +0100
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <david.safford@...com>,
        <monty.wiseman@...com>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>,
        "Matthew Garrett" <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] tpm: pass an array of tpm_extend_digest structures
 to tpm_pcr_extend()

On 1/21/2019 1:37 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 3. The would be nothing wrong exposing struct tpm_chip in
>     include/linux/tpm.h. I would be totally fine with that.

Should I do it in a separate patch (before 5/5)?

Is it fine to call tpm_default_chip() only in pcrlock() for trusted
keys?

Thanks

Roberto


> /Jarkko
> 

-- 
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI