linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 06/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: replace CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS with CONNCOUNT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121134914.168149053@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:47:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...udflare.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 06/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: replace CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS with CONNCOUNT_SLOTS

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...udflare.com>

commit c78e7818f16f687389174c4569243abbec8dc68f upstream.

Most of the time these were the same value anyway, but when
CONFIG_LOCKDEP was enabled we would use a smaller number of locks to
reduce overhead.  Unfortunately having two values is confusing and not
worth the complexity.

This fixes a bug where tree_gc_worker() would only GC up to
CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS trees which meant when CONFIG_LOCKDEP was enabled
not all trees would be GCed by tree_gc_worker().

Fixes: 5c789e131cbb9 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c |   19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
@@ -33,12 +33,6 @@
 
 #define CONNCOUNT_SLOTS		256U
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-#define CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS	8U
-#else
-#define CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS	256U
-#endif
-
 #define CONNCOUNT_GC_MAX_NODES	8
 #define MAX_KEYLEN		5
 
@@ -60,7 +54,7 @@ struct nf_conncount_rb {
 	struct rcu_head rcu_head;
 };
 
-static spinlock_t nf_conncount_locks[CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+static spinlock_t nf_conncount_locks[CONNCOUNT_SLOTS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 struct nf_conncount_data {
 	unsigned int keylen;
@@ -353,7 +347,7 @@ insert_tree(struct net *net,
 	unsigned int count = 0, gc_count = 0;
 	bool node_found = false;
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS]);
+	spin_lock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash]);
 
 	parent = NULL;
 	rbnode = &(root->rb_node);
@@ -430,7 +424,7 @@ insert_tree(struct net *net,
 	rb_link_node_rcu(&rbconn->node, parent, rbnode);
 	rb_insert_color(&rbconn->node, root);
 out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS]);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[hash]);
 	return count;
 }
 
@@ -499,7 +493,7 @@ static void tree_gc_worker(struct work_s
 	struct rb_node *node;
 	unsigned int tree, next_tree, gc_count = 0;
 
-	tree = data->gc_tree % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS;
+	tree = data->gc_tree % CONNCOUNT_SLOTS;
 	root = &data->root[tree];
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
@@ -621,10 +615,7 @@ static int __init nf_conncount_modinit(v
 {
 	int i;
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS > CONNCOUNT_SLOTS);
-	BUILD_BUG_ON((CONNCOUNT_SLOTS % CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS) != 0);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < CONNCOUNT_LOCK_SLOTS; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < CONNCOUNT_SLOTS; ++i)
 		spin_lock_init(&nf_conncount_locks[i]);
 
 	conncount_conn_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conncount_tuple",