linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 08/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: split gc in two phases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:48:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...udflare.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 08/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: split gc in two phases

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

commit f7fcc98dfc2d136722007fec0debbed761679b94 upstream.

The lockless workqueue garbage collector can race with packet path
garbage collector to delete list nodes, as it calls tree_nodes_free()
with the addresses of nodes that might have been free'd already from
another cpu.

To fix this, split gc into two phases.

One phase to perform gc on the connections: From a locking perspective,
this is the same as count_tree(): we hold rcu lock, but we do not
change the tree, we only change the nodes' contents.

The second phase acquires the tree lock and reaps empty nodes.
This avoids a race condition of the garbage collection vs.  packet path:
If a node has been free'd already, the second phase won't find it anymore.

This second phase is, from locking perspective, same as insert_tree().

The former only modifies nodes (list content, count), latter modifies
the tree itself (rb_erase or rb_insert).

Fixes: 5c789e131cbb9 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search")
Reviewed-by: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
@@ -500,16 +500,32 @@ static void tree_gc_worker(struct work_s
 	for (node = rb_first(root); node != NULL; node = rb_next(node)) {
 		rbconn = rb_entry(node, struct nf_conncount_rb, node);
 		if (nf_conncount_gc_list(data->net, &rbconn->list))
-			gc_nodes[gc_count++] = rbconn;
+			gc_count++;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();

 	spin_lock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[tree]);
+	if (gc_count < ARRAY_SIZE(gc_nodes))
+		goto next; /* do not bother */

-	if (gc_count) {
-		tree_nodes_free(root, gc_nodes, gc_count);
+	gc_count = 0;
+	node = rb_first(root);
+	while (node != NULL) {
+		rbconn = rb_entry(node, struct nf_conncount_rb, node);
+		node = rb_next(node);
+
+		if (rbconn->list.count > 0)
+			continue;
+
+		gc_nodes[gc_count++] = rbconn;
+		if (gc_count >= ARRAY_SIZE(gc_nodes)) {
+			tree_nodes_free(root, gc_nodes, gc_count);
+			gc_count = 0;
+		}
 	}

+	tree_nodes_free(root, gc_nodes, gc_count);
+next:
 	clear_bit(tree, data->pending_trees);

 	next_tree = (tree + 1) % CONNCOUNT_SLOTS;