lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5A_GaxqDkwZdbfm0E=pK7CE11t=u6GT137e21V_wRPOVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:25:40 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: docs-rst: Document m2m stateless video decoder interface

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:19 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:06 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/22/2019 07:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > > Documents the protocol that user-space should follow when
> > > communicating with stateless video decoders.
> > >
> > > The stateless video decoding API makes use of the new request and tags
> > > APIs. While it has been implemented with the Cedrus driver so far, it
> > > should probably still be considered staging for a short while.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >
> > > * Use timestamps instead of tags to reference frames,
> > > * Applied Paul's suggestions to not require one frame worth of data per OUTPUT
> > >   buffer
> > >
> > > One of the effects of requiring sub-frame units to be submitted per request is
> > > that the stateless decoders are not exactly "stateless" anymore: if a frame is
> > > made of several slices, then the decoder must keep track of the buffer in which
> > > the current frame is being decoded between requests, and all the slices for the
> > > current frame must be submitted before we can consider decoding the next one.
> > >
> > > Also if we decide to force clients to submit one slice per request, then doesn't
> > > some of the H.264 controls need to change? For instance, in the current v2
> > > there is still a v4l2_ctrl_h264_decode_param::num_slices member. It is used in
> > > Chromium to specify the number of slices given to the
> > > V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_SLICE_PARAMS control, but is apparently ignored by the
> > > Cedrus driver. Maxime, can you comment on this?
> > >
> > >  Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-codec.rst    |   5 +
> > >  .../media/uapi/v4l/dev-stateless-decoder.rst  | 378 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 383 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-stateless-decoder.rst
> > >
> >
> > Thank you! I have uploaded a version of the V4L2 spec with this and the two older
> > stateful codec patches applied:
> >
> > https://hverkuil.home.xs4all.nl/codec-api/uapi/v4l/dev-codec.html
>
> Thanks! A v3 will likely be necessary (and I'll likely be more
> reactive producing it) because of that one-slice-per-request
> requirement. After discussing with Tomasz we think it would be
> safer/simpler to require one frame per request in a first time, as we
> initially agreed.
>
> Anyway, we can discuss the details once Tomasz chimes in.

I've replied in the v1 thread, in reply to Paul's email.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ