linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 15/22] m68k: Dispatch nvram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190122091917.GA16612@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:19:17 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 15/22] m68k: Dispatch nvram_ops calls to Atari or Mac
 functions

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 03:18:56PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> A multi-platform kernel binary has to decide at run-time how to dispatch
> the arch_nvram_ops calls. Add a platform-independent arch_nvram_ops
> struct for this, to replace the atari-specific one.
> 
> Enable CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NVRAM_OPS for Macs.
> 
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
> ---
> Changed since v8:
>  - Adopted nvram_read_bytes() and nvram_write_bytes() where possible.

This patch fails to apply to my tree, what did you make it against?

I tried against 5.0-rc1 :(

Can you rebase this series against the char-misc-next branch of my
char-misc.git tree and resend so that I can apply the whole series?

thanks,

greg k-h