[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190122092207.GA339@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:22:07 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 15/22] m68k: Dispatch nvram_ops calls to Atari or Mac
functions
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:19:17AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 03:18:56PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > A multi-platform kernel binary has to decide at run-time how to dispatch
> > the arch_nvram_ops calls. Add a platform-independent arch_nvram_ops
> > struct for this, to replace the atari-specific one.
> >
> > Enable CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NVRAM_OPS for Macs.
> >
> > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
> > ---
> > Changed since v8:
> > - Adopted nvram_read_bytes() and nvram_write_bytes() where possible.
>
> This patch fails to apply to my tree, what did you make it against?
>
> I tried against 5.0-rc1 :(
>
> Can you rebase this series against the char-misc-next branch of my
> char-misc.git tree and resend so that I can apply the whole series?
Oops, nope, my fault, I missed some patches in this series, nevermind...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists