[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1548149874.27796.3.camel@mszsdaap41>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:37:54 +0800
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <stonea168@....com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
"Ajay Kumar" <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
<cawa.cheng@...iatek.com>, <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
<ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
<eddie.huang@...iatek.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Rahul Sharma" <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"Sean Paul" <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] pwm: Add MediaTek MT8183 display PWM driver support
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 10:16 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:02:43PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> > and add MT8183 specific register operations, such as MT8183
> > doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> > before writing register, and needs to select commit mode
> > and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
>
> There is no difference compared to (implicit) v1 sent a few minutes
> earlier, right? There was another patch sent with the same Subject last
> week, so I assume the mail from today without "v2" in the Subject was a
> mistake?
>
> > ---
> Adding a paragraph below the tripple dash that points out what was
> changed compared to the previous submission is a good idea to help
> reviewers to more easily see what was changed. I guess you only adapted
> the commit log as a reaction to Matthias Burgger's review?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
Yes, I miss the "V2" and fine tune the commit message.
Best Regards
Jitao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists