[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190122091603.ic46eyf47lu5f6pi@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:16:03 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, stonea168@....com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
cawa.cheng@...iatek.com, bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com,
eddie.huang@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] pwm: Add MediaTek MT8183 display PWM driver support
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:02:43PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> and add MT8183 specific register operations, such as MT8183
> doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> before writing register, and needs to select commit mode
> and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
There is no difference compared to (implicit) v1 sent a few minutes
earlier, right? There was another patch sent with the same Subject last
week, so I assume the mail from today without "v2" in the Subject was a
mistake?
> ---
Adding a paragraph below the tripple dash that points out what was
changed compared to the previous submission is a good idea to help
reviewers to more easily see what was changed. I guess you only adapted
the commit log as a reaction to Matthias Burgger's review?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists