[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190123092210.GU27931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:22:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:41:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 22-Jan 16:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:43:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > Do you think that could be acceptable?
> >
> > Think so, it's a sysctl poke, 'nobody' ever does that.
>
> Cool, so... I'll keep lazy update for system default.
Ah, I think I misunderstood. I meant to say that since nobody ever pokes
at sysctl's it doesn't matter if its a little more expensive and iterate
everything.
Also; if you always keep everything up-to-date, you can avoid doing that
duplicate accounting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists