[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124145835.2oy2tniepzpeekl2@e5254000004ec.dyn.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:58:35 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] driver core: Fix some issues related to device links
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:13:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Greg at al,
>
> Recently I have been looking at the device links code because of the
> recent discussion on possibly using them in the DRM subsystem (see for
> example https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=154832771905309&w=2) and I have
> found a few issues in that code which should be addressed by this patch
> series. Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
>
> None of the problems addressed here should be manifesting themselves in
> mainline kernel today, but if there are more device links users in the
> future, they most likely will be encountered sooner or later. Also they
> need to be fixed for the DRM use case to be supported IMO.
>
> This series does not fix all issues in device links that have become
> apparent (generally speaking, the idea of returning an existing link
> in case there is one already for the given consumer-supplier pair
> doesn't play well with stateful links and their flags), so there will
> be a follow-up series of patches to clean that up. Still, I don't see
> a reason to sit on these fixes while working on the other patches, so
> here they go.
Hi Rafael,
I've just given these a quick boot, unbind and rebind test with my
DRM case, and nothing seems to have regressed on the face of it.
Tested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists