[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124160637.0f8b47a7.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:06:37 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/13] KVM: s390: introduce struct
kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:59:33 +0100
Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Use this struct analog to the kvm interruption structs
> for kvm emulated floating and local interruptions.
I guess that makes sense.
> Further fields will be added with this series as
> required.
A reference to "this series" will look a bit strange if you look at the
committed patch later. What about:
"GIB handling will add further fields to this structure as required."
?
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++-
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists