[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a9f57ea6-4f87-3af0-46c9-695708f98649@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:24:28 +0100
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/13] KVM: s390: introduce struct
kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt
On 24.01.19 16:06, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:59:33 +0100
> Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Use this struct analog to the kvm interruption structs
>> for kvm emulated floating and local interruptions.
>
> I guess that makes sense.
>
>> Further fields will be added with this series as
>> required.
>
> A reference to "this series" will look a bit strange if you look at the
> committed patch later. What about:
>
> "GIB handling will add further fields to this structure as required."
Yes, that reads pretty well. I will replace the sentence.
>
> ?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++-
>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists