[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190124182502.GA18351@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:25:02 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
treding@...dia.com, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
noralf@...nnes.org, johan@...nel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, michal.vokac@...ft.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, john.garry@...wei.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, robin.murphy@....com,
sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com, icenowy@...c.io,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] fieldbus_dev: add Fieldbus Device subsystem.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:07:58PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:52 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > SPDX "GPL-2.0+" please.
> >
> > > would be if this code was derived from v2-only code that can't be
> > > relicensed anymore.
> >
> > Are you _sure_ you want v2+? I ask as I am forced to :)
> >
>
> The licencing choice confuses me. Why would I choose a different
> licence to what the Linux kernel itself is provided under?
The Linux kernel is provided under "GPLv2" not "GPLv2+"
"GPLv2" means "GPLv2 only"
"GPLv2+" means "Any version of the GPL that the FSF decides to create
from now until the end of time."
> If I did pick a different one, what are the tradeoffs between GPLv2 and GPLv2+ ?
That is for you and your lawyers to discuss :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists