linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] fieldbus_dev: add Fieldbus Device subsystem.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGngYiU2kLqQq5qkcxda9m__VWx62bsC=+ni4HAGMsOAxAtUzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:07:58 -0500
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
        treding@...dia.com, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        noralf@...nnes.org, johan@...nel.org,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, michal.vokac@...ft.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, john.garry@...wei.com,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, robin.murphy@....com,
        sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com, icenowy@...c.io,
        Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] fieldbus_dev: add Fieldbus Device subsystem.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:52 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> SPDX "GPL-2.0+" please.
>
> > would be if this code was derived from v2-only code that can't be
> > relicensed anymore.
>
> Are you _sure_ you want v2+?  I ask as I am forced to :)
>

The licencing choice confuses me. Why would I choose a different
licence to what the Linux kernel itself is provided under?
If I did pick a different one, what are the tradeoffs between GPLv2 and GPLv2+ ?