lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:31:20 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> To: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com> Cc: dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, lijun_nudt@....com, oulijun@...wei.com, liudongdong3@...wei.com, linuxarm@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xavier_huwei@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 rdma-next 2/3] RDMA/hns: Fix the chip hanging caused by sending mailbox&CMQ during reset On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote: > > > On 2019/1/24 6:40, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:36:06AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote: > > > >> +static int hns_roce_v2_cmd_hw_resetting(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, > >> + unsigned long instance_stage, > >> + unsigned long reset_stage) > >> +{ > >> + struct hns_roce_v2_priv *priv = (struct hns_roce_v2_priv *)hr_dev->priv; > >> + struct hnae3_handle *handle = priv->handle; > >> + const struct hnae3_ae_ops *ops = handle->ae_algo->ops; > >> + unsigned long end; > >> + > >> + /* When hardware reset is detected, we should stop sending mailbox&cmq > >> + * to hardware, and wait until hardware reset finished. If now > >> + * in .init_instance() function, we should exit with error. If now at > >> + * HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT stage of soft reset process, we should exit with > >> + * error, and then HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT related process can rollback the > >> + * operation like notifing hardware to free resources, HNAE3_INIT_CLIENT > >> + * related process will exit with error to notify NIC driver to > >> + * reschedule soft reset process once again. > >> + */ > >> + end = msecs_to_jiffies(HNS_ROCE_V2_HW_RST_TIMEOUT) + jiffies; > >> + while (ops->get_hw_reset_stat(handle) && time_before(jiffies, end)) > >> + udelay(1); > > I thought you were getting rid of these loops? > Hi, Jason > > Upper applications maybe notify driver to issue mailbox or CMD > commands to hardware, some commands used to cancel resources, > destory bt/destory cq/unreg mr/destory qp etc. when such > commands are executed successfully, the hardware engine will > no longer access some memory registered by the driver. > > When reset occurs, it is possible for upper applications notify driver > to issue mailbox or CMD commands, we need to wait until hardware > reset finished to ensure that hardware no longer accesses related > memory. You should not wait for things using loops like the above. Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists