[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190125132614.GB1795@kadam>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:26:14 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
weidu.du@...wei.com, Fang Wei <fangwei1@...wei.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: erofs: use xattr_prefix to wrap up
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:51:03PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Let's use xattr_prefix instead of open code.
> No logic changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> index 1c9498e38f0e..eca65df46133 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int xattr_entrylist(struct xattr_iter *_it,
> return 1;
>
> /* Note that at least one of 'prefix' and 'name' should be non-NULL */
The comment is sort of confusing now.
> - prefix = h->prefix != NULL ? h->prefix : h->name;
> + prefix = xattr_prefix(h);
> prefix_len = strlen(prefix);
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists