[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190128114926.GE1795@kadam>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:49:26 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, tkjos@...roid.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org, arve@...roid.com,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, maco@...roid.com, tkjos@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: fix CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:47:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:23:20AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Several users have tried to only rely on binderfs to provide binder devices
> > and set CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES="" empty. This is a great use-case of
> > binderfs and one that was always intended to work. However, this is
> > currently not possible since setting CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES="" emtpy
> > will simply panic the kernel:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> It should just do a WARN() and not panic the kernel.
>
Oh... They have panic on warn set up probably. Never mind.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists