[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbG5Abcp0wzgyVpr06n-f=Djs_zzRxwgMX1xCxwEnUSog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:47:27 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, syq@...ian.org,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, 772753199@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] Pinctrl: Ingenic: Fix bugs caused by
differences between JZ4770 and JZ4780.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:43 PM Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I am working on v2, and I have removed the
> fourth patch in v2,
> so there will be no warnings at compile time. But this will cause some
> warning messages
> when checkpatch, I am confused whether I can ignore these warnings.
I don't care super much about checkpatch warnings, compiler
warnings for const correctness is more important.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists