lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbG5Abcp0wzgyVpr06n-f=Djs_zzRxwgMX1xCxwEnUSog@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:47:27 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com>
Cc:     linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, syq@...ian.org,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, 772753199@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] Pinctrl: Ingenic: Fix bugs caused by
 differences between JZ4770 and JZ4780.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:43 PM Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your reply. I am working on v2, and I have removed the
> fourth patch in v2,
> so there will be no warnings at compile time. But this will cause some
> warning messages
> when checkpatch, I am confused whether I can ignore these warnings.

I don't care super much about checkpatch warnings, compiler
warnings for const correctness is more important.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ