linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2] async: Add cmdline option to specify drivers to be async probed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:20:16 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] async: Add cmdline option to specify drivers to be async probed

Asynchronous driver probing can help much on kernel fastboot, and
this option can provide a flexible way to optimize and quickly verify
async driver probe.

Also it will help in below cases:
* Some driver actually covers several families of HWs, some of which
  could use async probing while others don't. So we can't simply
  turn on the PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS flag in driver, but use this
  cmdline option, like igb driver async patch discussed at
  https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg545986.html

* For SOC (System on Chip) with multiple spi or i2c controllers, most
  of the slave spi/i2c devices will be assigned with fixed controller
  number, while async probing may make those controllers get different
  index for each boot, which prevents those controller drivers to be
  async probed. For platforms not using these spi/i2c slave devices,
  they can use this cmdline option to benefit from the async probing.

Suggested-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
---
 drivers/base/dd.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 8ac10af..cfa704a 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ static atomic_t deferred_trigger_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 static struct dentry *deferred_devices;
 static bool initcalls_done;

+/* Save the async probe drivers' name from kernel cmdline */
+#define ASYNC_DRV_NAMES_MAX_LEN	256
+static char async_probe_drv_names[ASYNC_DRV_NAMES_MAX_LEN];
+
 /*
  * In some cases, like suspend to RAM or hibernation, It might be reasonable
  * to prohibit probing of devices as it could be unsafe.
@@ -674,8 +678,27 @@ int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
 	return ret;
 }

+static inline bool cmdline_requested_async_probing(const char *drv_name)
+{
+	return parse_option_str(async_probe_drv_names, drv_name);
+}
+
+/* The format is like driver_async_probe=drv_name1,drv_name2,drv_name3 */
+static int __init save_async_options(char *buf)
+{
+	if (strlen(buf) >= ASYNC_DRV_NAMES_MAX_LEN)
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Too long list for async_probe_drv_names!");
+
+	strlcpy(async_probe_drv_names, buf, ASYNC_DRV_NAMES_MAX_LEN);
+	return 0;
+}
+__setup("driver_async_probe=", save_async_options);
+
 bool driver_allows_async_probing(struct device_driver *drv)
 {
+	if (cmdline_requested_async_probing(drv->name))
+		return true;
+
 	switch (drv->probe_type) {
 	case PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS:
 		return true;
-- 
2.7.4