linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/events: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190129170458.GC27037@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:04:58 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/events: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:19:59AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Yeah. But I don't want to send patches to every person that has touched the file.

Yes but you should *definitely* CC supporters and reviewers.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.