linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6795096d-988a-89ce-b6f7-9a326830d195@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:57:46 +0000
From:   Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels

Hi Arnaldo,

>> Sorry - I do not think that I have the authority to do that.  I am not a
>> perftools maintainer (or a kernel maintainer).  For what it is worth the 
>> patch does look good to me, but I think that a real maintainer needs to 
>> approve it.
> 
> Ok, I was more thinking about this part of
> Documentation/process/submittingpatches.txt:
> 
> ----------------------------
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:.  It is a record that the acker
> has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.  Hence patch
> mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me"
> into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an
> explicit ack).
> ----------------------------
> 
> But its ok, if you still don't feel this should be added, I'll just
> leave a Cc: you, ok?