[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f30f65e-e894-1aa9-882b-c4172f9bcfee@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:58:42 +0000
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels
Hi Arnaldo,
[oops- hit send by mistake...]
>> Sorry - I do not think that I have the authority to do that. I am not a
> Ok, I was more thinking about this part of
> Documentation/process/submittingpatches.txt:
>
> ----------------------------
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker
> has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch
> mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me"
> into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an
> explicit ack).
> ----------------------------
>
> But its ok, if you still don't feel this should be added, I'll just
> leave a Cc: you, ok?
Yes - this would be fine with me.
Cheers
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists